Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 01:27:43 08/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 1999 at 03:24:37, Terje Vagle wrote: >On August 27, 1999 at 03:04:30, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On August 27, 1999 at 02:40:49, Terje Vagle wrote: >> >>>I'm running Crafty 16.15/16.16 on a PII-450, 128 MB ram,Win-98, Winboard 4.0.2 >>>and HT=64MB >>> >>>I'm running Rebel 9 on a portable P-266MMX with 32 MB ram,Win-98, HT=13MB >>> >>>Running them manually against each other, Rebel wins EVERY time,( about 35 games >>>so far ) both at blitz and at longer time-controls. >>> >>>Any comments? >>> >>>( Yes I know that Crafty is free and Rebel is not, but we all know what internet >>>can provide these days ) > > > >1) Tell me the right config. > >2) what do you mean with " it is just not true"? I think he means that it is false. Rebel simply isn't good enough to beat a 'proper' crafty 35-0. For example, Ed Schroder recently ran a match between Rebel and Crafty on equal hardware and Rebel won 29.5 - 15.5. See: http://www.rebel.nl/cent1.htm#STRENGTH > >Terje >>> >>>And yes, I have the original Rebel 8 and 9. >> >>This kind of post comes up sometimes and I don't understand it. The only >>reasonable conclusion I can draw from a report that Rebel has won 35 in a row >>against Crafty, while running on inferior hardware, is that something is wrong >>with your Crafty installation. >> >>Winning a few in a row is random and might indicate some superiority but might >>not. Winning 35 in a row is completely insane, it's like a thousand rating >>points. That's just not true, and I'd be surprised if someone here tried to >>suggest differently. >> >>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.