Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:08:33 08/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 1999 at 11:21:22, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Hello, > >the result from the WT-5 tournament from Kai Skibbe, Christian Koch and me ! > >40 moves in 40 minutes, >AMD K6-2 333 MHz, Pentium III 504 MHz and AMD K6-3 450 MHz, >~ 32 MB for Hash-Tables, >Ponder = Off > >Crafty, Voyager, Comet, Patzer, Bringer using 4-pieces Nalimov Table-Base >Gromit and AnMon using 4-pieces Edwards Table-Bases ! You do know that 'voyager' is a dead copy of crafty, right? With just the key character constants converted to German. This was revealed several months ago and there was _zero_ doubt as I went thru the executable carefully and posted a lot of what I found, just to make it clear... > >IMPORTANT NOTE >Zarkov, Nimzo, Voyager, LGoliath, Patzer, Francesca und LambChop >are versions of programs in development and have been offered by >authors to Kai, Chritian and Frank only for the explicit purpose >of organizing this tournament. THEY ARE NOT PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ! > >01. Nimzo 2000a 102,0/144 70,83% 2572 ELO >02. Zarkov 4.5h 95,5/144 66,32% 2538 ELO >03. Crafty 16.11-16.15 92,0/144 63,89% 2521 ELO >04. Voyager 5.08-6.01 89,5/144 62,15% 2510 ELO >05. LGoliath 2000 75,5/144 52,43% 2445 ELO >06. Comet B.04-B.05 75,0/144 52,08% 2444 ELO >07. AnMon 4.26-4.27 70,0/144 48,61% 2421 ELO >08. Patzer 3.0 64,0/144 44,44% 2394 ELO >09. Phalanx 21 60,0/144 41,67% 2375 ELO >10. Francesca 0.68d-0.70 58,5/144 40,63% 2369 ELO >11. Gromit 2.20 58,0/144 40,28% 2367 ELO >12. LambChop 8.2 51,0/144 35,42% 2333 ELO >13. Bringer 1.4-1.5 45,0/144 31,25% 2303 ELO > >You can download the 936 games under ... >http://members.xoom.com/VolkerPi/ > >Nimzo 2000a play very strong and this version is more than 100 ELO better than >Nimzo 2000 ! Voyager win the matches against Nimzo 2000a, Zarkov 4.5h and Crafty >16.15 with 6,5 : 5,5 lose against Gromit with 5,0 : 7,0 ! > >LambChop 8.2 play more than 100 ELO better than LambChop 7.1, this is very >great, LambChop play an interesting chess, I like this program (and AnMon :-) >and the others) > >For the new chess program Bringer ist this result sensational ! LGoliath 2000 >play ca. 75-100 ELO better than LGoliath Gold 2.05 ! > >From Francesca we become in the last round an update. This new Francesca version >play stronger. OK, when we play the next tournament, but not in the next 3-4 >months I think ! > >The Crafty versions play an fantastic chess and I can not understand that Dr. >Robert Hyatt say that the time managment from Crafty is bad when Crafty play on >one machine. I can not see that. Crafty play under Winboard (without ponder) >matches with a good time control and blitz not the last moves before the time >control ending !!! > >In 620 games with Crafty (see the ELO-Ranglist from Kai Skibbe, Christian Koch >and me under ... http://members.xoom.com/VolkerPi/ I see (when i looked the >games, not all games) not problems with the time-managmant from Crafty on one >PC. > >In 4550 games under Winboard we have 30 games with time problems, but the most >of this 30 games are problems from the engines, not problems with time controls. > >We have all log files from Crafty (WT-5) and I looked this and see not problems >with the time control, sorry Bob (great results from Crafty) ! > >OK, thanks for the programmer which give your programs for this tournament and >sorry for my bad english. > >Kind regards >Frank
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.