Author: Pete Galati
Date: 14:25:49 08/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 1999 at 17:54:34, eric guttenberg wrote: >Robert, > >I suspect that what Harald is talking about is that this is the second >post you have made recently in which you make an assertion that appears >to contradict all known evidence and is based on a number of games which >you do not publish. No one looks at F5.32 as a weak program, just as >no one really believes CM5000 is stronger than CM6000 as you claimed in an >earlier post in which you stated that in your tests CM5000 scores >60% against CM6000-again without publishing the games. > >It just seems to me that if you are going to report unusual or surprising >results, you ought to post the games. All of them. > > >eric Yeah, I only want to note that we have not seen these games where he reportedly beat this very weak Fritz 5.32 program. Since we have nothing to go on (we STILL have not seen the games) I'm going with the assumtion that his computer was malfuntioning causing the generally strong program to play weak. I have no interest in what anyones rating is or any bearing that may have on the ability to win against a strong program. Not that showing us the games would prove that it did happen, but without even seeing the games, I'm quite sure that it did not happen. Same thing with me and Deeper Blue, it didn't happen, sorry about trolling in a trolling thread. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.