Author: Heiko Mikala
Date: 16:11:56 09/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 1999 at 19:01:32, Mark Young wrote:
>On September 01, 1999 at 18:26:48, Heiko Mikala wrote:
>>
>>game/60', 2 * Cyrix/IBM 6x86MX PR-300
>>
>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13.0/17
>>2 CSTal II ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0/17
>
>This is the same kind of results I have seen posted many times by many
>different members with other top programs playing CST.
>
>I just don't know how TC get all those good results when he tests CST against
>the top programs.
Well, if you only take the first 9 games of this match, it becomes this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 5/9
2 CSTal II ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 4/9
Not that bad, is it?
As I said, I don't understand what happened during the second half of the match.
But these series are not uncommon in long matches. Nevertheless, I *think* that
Hiarcs is stronger than CSTal II, but this is only a feeling. Not proven yet.
Greetings,
Heiko.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.