Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 00:12:25 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 1999 at 23:52:32, Dave Gomboc wrote: >I object to a post once every couple of months... on the average, not as a >quota. <grin> Sometimes the moderators agree, sometimes they do not. I have a >pretty good idea of which cases are borderline and which are not before I even >email them. I believe their time is valuable, so I try not to waste it. While >I cannot speak for all people who in good conscience use the "email moderator" >facility provided for this purpose, I take your comments more personally than >perhaps I should, so I'll be presumptuous and assume that your opinions are >somewhat motivated by my past behavior. It seems to me that you've been beating >this issue for far too long. If you wanted to exercise policy, you should have >remained as a moderator instead of resigning. > >FYI, when a poster lodges a complaint, a moderator gets back to them with their >decision, and an explanation. People who do use "email moderator" get feedback >on why a decision to retain or remove a post has occured. That you do not >receive such feedback is no indication that others feel that it's "open season", >so to speak. I have plenty of time to answer email from bugged members. Answering email from members is not how this job sucks time. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.