Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:42:25 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 18:34:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 01, 1999 at 19:01:32, Mark Young wrote: > >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13.0/17 >>>2 CSTal II ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0/17 >> >>This is the same kind of results I have seen posted many times by many different >>members with other top programs playing CST. > > >because i don't use this cheating instrument. >i don't use cyrix/IBM cpu's but amd. >and i do test 40/120. > >i know why YOU and others get different results. YOU use the autoplayer >of this company. > >and the cheating continues... Not true, We got the same results playing by hand also, but no need to rehash this. You have your good results, and all others have the bad results playing by hand or autoplayer. Go figure!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.