Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:48:33 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 18:42:12, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 01, 1999 at 18:52:39, Mark Young wrote: > >>Yes IMO CST plays unsound chess, any program can have great wins, but if you >>lose 9 out of 10 games to get that one great win....IMO I don't call that >>program a great program with an exciting style of play. I would just call it >>sad, in light of all the very good programs on the market today that also >>generate great wins. No need to name the programs.... > >show me on opponent cstal loses 9 out of 10. without using >the chessbase autoplayer and other dirty tricks. >play the games manually operated 40/120 and ponder on NOT on XT-machines >but on intel MMX or AMD. >show me one program cstal loses 9 out of 10. > > >>As many of us know, you can take cm6000 and get the same style of play as CST, >>but with a much better tactical eye. > >you are free to use the program you want. >cstal works different than the king. >but sometimes produces similar results. but the king cannot play >this much "unsound". > > >>I have nothing against CST style of play or any style of play, but the program >>must be able to win with that style. > >your 9/10 is a lie. Im sorry but scores this bad for CST have been known and posted. The only good results for CST I have ever seen have been posted by you. >only if you manipulate the circumstances in favour of the other program, than >you can work out a 9/10. but not in a real match on a championship. > > >>Mark "The Bean Counter" > >right. >counting faked beans.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.