Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 03:12:39 09/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 1999 at 05:45:37, blass uri wrote: >On September 09, 1999 at 03:56:02, Shep wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>despite Thorsten's claims, CSTal is occasionally able to play some brilliant >>games at Blitz time controls. > >Thorsten did not claim that tal cannot play brilliant moves at Blitz time >control but only that it earns more from time relative to other programs. > >The fact that tal lost the games only support thorsten's claim. > >I am not sure if thorsten's claim is correct. >tal lost against crafty16.15 5:2 in James walker's games inspite of better >hardware so I do not think it is a very good program at slow time control. > >I am interested to see if crafty16.15 can do better results(with the same >hardware advantage) against tal in blitz. > > >I see from walker's games that tal is not a good program(not only by counting >results but also by looking at the games) and the only question is if tal is >even worse at blitz. > >Uri Oopss! Hm, you just try Tal yourself... Of course the ratingdiff. would be about 500 points, but I think we should appreciate Tal as a rare flower in the garden of computerchess. Much better suited to play humans than other programs... Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.