Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 15:36:12 09/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 1999 at 11:50:50, Ed Schröder wrote: >On September 10, 1999 at 07:50:36, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>On September 10, 1999 at 06:04:42, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>>Perhaps Ed should clarify this issue. >>> >>>My only goal is to find out how Rebel will do against GM's at tournament >>>time control. Because of the attention the event gets I can afford to put >>>some money and time in it. >>> >>>As for the question, "count this game or not" I on my abacus will not >>>count this game because the game was not representative to the above >>>mentioned goal. >>> >>>Officially this game counts of course. A PC can break any time. A pity but >>>it is simply all in the game. A human can go to the bathroom and lose on >>>time, no win on my personal abacus then but the win officially will count. >>> >>>Anyway in 8 days Rebel can try again against Lithuania (1 x GM and 3 x IM). >>> >>>Ed Schroder >> >>Hi Ed >> >>Do you think that all the problems are fixed, are you changing any program or >>hardware for this upcoming match. And if so do you think that it is worse or >>better for your chances at winning. > >I will change hardware. I am after the Athlon-650 at the moment. I don't >think the Athlon-650 will run faster than the K6-III-600 I am having now. Perhaps Bruce is right and you are again putting Rebel riding a wild ponny. I would love to see how Rebel does using a more conventional hardware as that we generally have. I mean, a 233, 266 or so Mhz stuff. fernando > >I also think book preparation must be done better as the Benko-gambit line >was not good for Rebel, too much strategic involved. I am not so optimistic >anymore than I was after the 2 nice draws. > >Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.