Author: James Robertson
Date: 15:00:40 09/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 1999 at 17:57:04, Mark Young wrote: >On September 11, 1999 at 16:21:53, James Robertson wrote: > >>Today in a game with blik on FICS, my program reached the following position: >> >>2r1r1k1/3p1p1p/p2Qp1p1/q1N2P2/Pn1B1P2/6P1/2P3bP/2KRR3 b - - >> >>After about 3 seconds my program played ... Bf3?? which loses to Qe5. I ran my >>program on the position after the game it only then did it realise that ... >>Na2+! wins (and wins big). >> >>It takes it 9.5 seconds to realise that, a little too slow for the game. Crafty >>16.16 takes about 20 seconds to find ... Na2 (in the meantime it plays ... Rb8 >>which it says wins material) on the same hardware (P233, 4MB hash table). >> >>Anyway, here is my program's output. What does your program say about the >>position? >> >>Depth Score Time Nodes PV >> 1 -30 0 191 Qc7 Qxc7 Rxc7 fxe6 fxe6 >> 2 -30 0 1130 Qc7 Qxc7 Rxc7 fxe6 fxe6 >> 3 6 50 5768 Bf3 fxg6 Bxd1 Rxd1 hxg6 Qxd7 >> 4 19 220 22509 Bc6 Nxd7 Bxd7 Qxd7 Rxc2+ Kb1 >> 5> 70 660 66198 exf5 Rxe8+ Rxe8 Qxd7 Bc6 Qd6 Bxa4 >> 5 70 770 78189 exf5 Rxe8+ Rxe8 Qxd7 Bc6 Qd6 Bxa4 >> 6> 21 2800 301776 Bf3 Qe5 Na2+ Kb1 f6 Qxf6 Bxd1 Rxd1 >> 6 21 3620 392090 Bf3 Qe5 Na2+ Kb1 f6 Qxf6 Bxd1 Rxd1 >> 7> 168 9550 1062091 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ c4 Qxc4+ Kb1 Rb8+ >> Bb2 Qa2+ Kc1 Qxb2+ >> 7 168 9830 1099308 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ c4 Qxc4+ Kb1 Rb8+ >> Bb2 Qa2+ Kc1 Qxb2+ >> 8 260 12190 1392528 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ c4 Qxc4+ Kb1 Rb8+ >> Bb2 Qa2+ Kc2 Qxb2+ Kd3 Qxh2 fxg6 fxg6 >> 9 260 16260 1938555 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ c4 Qxc4+ Kb1 Rb8+ >> Bb2 Qa2+ Kc2 Qxb2+ Kd3 Qxh2 fxg6 fxg6 >> 10 390 31250 3854123 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ Qxd5 exd5 c3 Qc4+ >> Ka3 d6 Nb3 Rxe1 Rxe1 gxf5 >> 11 392 56680 7268592 Na2+ Kb2 Qb4+ Kxa2 Bd5+ Qxd5 exd5 c3 Qc4+ >> Ka3 Re2 Nb3 Rxh2 fxg6 hxg6 Re7 > >New position >2r1r1k1/3p1p1p/p2Qp1p1/q1N2P2/Pn1B1P2/6P1/2P3bP/2KRR3 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 5.00/16Bit: > >1...Rxc5 2.Bxc5 > +- (1.56) depth: 1/1 00:00:00 >1...Nxc2 > +- (1.53) depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >1...Nxc2 2.Kxc2 gxf5 > ± (1.09) depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >1...exf5 > ³ (-0.28) depth: 1/8 00:00:00 >1...exf5 2.Rxe8+ Rxe8 3.Qxd7 > ³ (-0.28) depth: 2/2 00:00:00 >1...Rb8 > ³ (-0.31) depth: 2/6 00:00:00 >1...Rb8 2.c3 Na2+ 3.Kc2 > ³ (-0.50) depth: 3/3 00:00:00 3kN >1...Bf3 > ³ (-0.53) depth: 3/17 00:00:00 8kN >1...Bf3 2.fxg6 hxg6 3.Qxd7 Bxd1 4.Rxd1 > µ (-0.97) depth: 3/23 00:00:00 11kN >1...Bf3 2.fxg6 hxg6 3.Qxd7 Bxd1 4.Rxd1 > µ (-0.97) depth: 4/4 00:00:00 16kN >1...Bf3 2.fxg6 Rc7 3.gxf7+ Kxf7 4.h3 Bxd1 5.Rxd1 > = (0.03) depth: 5/5 00:00:01 65kN >1...Rb8 > = (0.00) depth: 5/29 00:00:01 107kN >1...Rb8 2.Kd2 Na2+ 3.Kd3 Bf3 4.fxg6 Bxd1 5.gxf7+ Kxf7 6.Rxd1 > µ (-0.75) depth: 5/29 00:00:01 113kN >1...Rb8 2.c3 Na2+ 3.Kd2 > µ (-0.81) depth: 6/6 00:00:01 209kN >1...Na2+ > µ (-0.84) depth: 6/26 00:00:01 305kN >1...Na2+ 2.Kb2 Qb4+ 3.Kxa2 Bd5+ 4.c4 Qxc4+ 5.Kb1 Rb8+ 6.Bb2 > -+ (-3.03) depth: 6/26 00:00:01 354kN >1...Na2+ 2.Kb2 Qb4+ 3.Kxa2 Bd5+ 4.c4 Qxc4+ 5.Kb1 Rb8+ 6.Bb2 > -+ (-3.03) depth: 7/7 00:00:02 455kN >1...Na2+ 2.Kb2 Qb4+ 3.Kxa2 Bd5+ 4.Qxd5 exd5 5.Rxe8+ Rxe8 6.fxg6 > -+ (-3.16) depth: 8/8 00:00:03 648kN >1...Na2+ 2.Kb2 Qb4+ 3.Kxa2 Bd5+ 4.Qxd5 exd5 5.Rxe8+ Rxe8 6.fxg6 > -+ (-3.16) depth: 9/9 00:00:06 1317kN >1...Na2+ 2.Kb2 Qb4+ 3.Kxa2 Bd5+ 4.Qxd5 exd5 5.Rxe8+ Rxe8 6.fxg6 > -+ (-3.34) depth: 10/10 00:00:14 2972kN >1...Na2+ > -+ (-3.66) depth: 11/11 00:00:30 8603kN > >(Young, 9/11/99) So it takes Fritz 1 second? That is pretty good.... what is the hardware speed? James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.