Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pawn Majorities - an interesting evaluation issue

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:18:20 09/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 1999 at 04:19:12, Dan Andersson wrote:

>Yes its important to realize that in many (as in not a small minority)
>circumstances doubled pawns do better in stopping majorities from realizing
>themselves.
\

that was easy using bitmaps.  IE the current candidate passer detection
easily finds that with white pawns on a2/b2/c2, black pawns on a7/b7, that
it has a candidate passer/candidate outside passer.  But it also knows that
moving the black pawn to b6 disrupts this totally and requires white to sac
a pawn to get a passer, but giving black one as well (the pawn race will at
least make it do this in the right cases however.)

The real issue is overall pawn structure.  In the middlegame I would rather
have a7/b7 for black.  In that endgame, I would rather have b6/b7...  it seems
a bit messy to handle properly...  even though the code for detecting the
candidate passer was easy... using the information is not so easy...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.