Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:40:41 09/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 15:59:02, James T. Walker wrote: >On September 17, 1999 at 06:49:49, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On September 16, 1999 at 18:48:39, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >> >>>Hi Thorsten >>> >>>What happened with the game you commented so vividly? >>>(e6 in the Sicilian with 11... f5) >>>I looked at it and wanted to see the end. Wasn't it >>>interesting any more or did I miss another post? >>> >>>Ralf >> >>I have posted it, it is game 5. Hiarcs lost. >> >>[Event "k6-400"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "1999.09.15"] >>[Round "5"] >>[White "CSTal2.03"] >>[Black "Hiarcs7.32"] >>[ECO "B40"] >>[Result "1-0"] >> >>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Bb4 6. e5 >>Nd5 7. Bd2 Nxc3 8. bxc3 Ba5 9. Qg4 O-O 10. Bd3 Nc6 11. Nf3 >>f5 12. exf6 Qxf6 13. O-O g6 14. Bh6 Bxc3 15. Rab1 Re8 >>16. Rb3 Ba5 17. Ng5 Ne5 18. Qg3 Bc7 19. Rc3 Nf7 20. Rxc7 >>Nxh6 21. Qh4 Qf8 22. Re1 Re7 23. Re3 b6 24. g4 Qf4 25. Qxh6 >>Ba6 26. Rc3 Qxg4+ 27. Rg3 Qd1+ 28. Kg2 Bb7+ 29. Be4 Bxe4+ >>30. Nxe4 Qd5 31. Qh4 Rg7 32. Rgf3 Kh8 33. Nf6 Qb7 34. Qd4 >>b5 35. Ne4 Qd5 36. Qxd5 exd5 37. Nd6 b4 38. Rce3 d4 39. Re5 >>h6 40. Rf4 a5 41. Rxd4 Kg8 42. Rf4 Kh7 43. Kf1 g5 44. Rff5 >>Rg6 45. Re7+ Rg7 46. Re4 Kg6 47. Rd5 Ra6 48. h4 gxh4 >>49. Rg4+ Kh7 50. Rxh4 Rg6 51. Nf5 Ra7 52. Re5 d6 53. Rd5 >>Re6 54. Ne3 Ra8 55. Rf5 Ra7 56. Rfh5 Ra6 57. Ng4 d5 >>58. Rxd5 Red6 59. Rdh5 Rdc6 60. Ne3 Rc7 61. Re5 Rb7 62. Ke2 >>Kg7 63. Nf5+ Kh7 64. Ke3 Rc7 65. Nd4 Kg8 66. Rhh5 Rc3+ >>67. Ke4 Ra3 68. Re7 Rf6 69. Rb5 Rxf2 70. Rbb7 Rg3 71. Ne6 >>1-0 > >Hello Thorsten, >I have a question concerning this game. My version of CStal-2 has "3. f4" as >the book move here. There is no other book move in the "Legal Moves" list. The >move played "3. Nf3" is number 8 on the list with a score of 0.78. Why would >your CSTal-2 play a non book move when it has a book move here? >Jim Walker I would like to see you test Hiarcs 7.32 vs CST. As with my matches in the past with CST when a honest person plays them, CST gets crushed badly. This is the same "game" Thorsten played when he played Fritz against CST. As everyone knows Fritz killed CST except when Thorsten played the match. I see Thorsten is using the same fall back excuse when CST got beat by Crafty. You know that EVIL autoplayer. Maybe its about time to show people how easy it is to fake a match, and not show any obvious proof that the match has been fixed, except by the Results. I think I will make Comet the hero against Hiarcs 7.32.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.