Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CSTal-2 vs Hiarcs 7.32 (Game 5)

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 10:19:03 09/20/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 20, 1999 at 10:42:33, Harald Faber wrote:

>> This
>>version is a sampler, Oxford Softworks expects
>> to release open-format source code for any bone-fide developer to use to:

>I can see no hint that this 2.50 is a broken version.

I see no hint that you are a bone-fide developer. it is clearly said that
this version is a sampler.

>The problem is: it is always a broken version if it loses. :-)

2.03 is not broken. also it does not lose more or less times than hiarcs is
doing. so spare your irony.

>Funny. So you only accept results and games by people you personally know or if
>the result fits to your opinion? Really funny. :-))

i do except results from people who do not work like you or shep have shown
how "minded" people work. Yes.
I think it is obvious why i cannot except your strange games nor sheps testing
a broken version results-.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.