Author: blass uri
Date: 11:12:04 09/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 1999 at 08:33:02, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 20, 1999 at 00:58:02, Harald Faber wrote: > >>Then a hint on the homepage that this version is broken and not useful for >>playing would be very useful, right? > >The homepage says this: > > > > > Chess System Tal Version 2.50 pre-alpha version for download only by bone-fide >chess program developers who have > already purchased a copy of CSTal II..CSTal II support files are required for >proper operation. > CSTal 2.50 forms the basis of Oxford Softworks designs for Chess System Tal >III. Chess System Tal III will be an > open-format multiple engine, N-Brain and user interface system, using Windows >95/98/NT. Operation is fully Windows > compatible and multi-threaded. > CSTal 2.50 comes with multiple engines and N-Brain engine choosers .. This >version is a sampler, Oxford Softworks expects > to release open-format source code for any bone-fide developer to use to: > > > add engines to CSTal III > > > display information from an added engine in the interface > > > allow for development of intelligent N-Brain choosers > > > add chess position specific elements such as opening books, end game >table bases, king-pawn handlers, > middlegame handlers and so on. I think that the first sentences in the homepage should be: "Chess system Tal 2.50 is clearly weaker than other versions of Cstal." and in this case everything is going to be clear. > >>BTW you alyways complained that everybody who got different and much worse >>results than you get used a broken version, if it was CST1 or whatever. > >Right. With CSTal1 it was the same. some people like to test broken versions >:-)) I do not think that people want to test a broken version. I think that this is a misunderstanding. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.