Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 12:25:00 09/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1999 at 12:55:25, Joshua Lee wrote: >SSDF might as well start over, hire some masters or GM's to play some of the top >programs ,(and i don't mean 2 games or whatever the small number of human vs >computer games they originally had played) but since they are going to cheese >and not do this the best thing is to take LCTII results and subtract 200points. >For example Hiarcs rates itself 2450 on my K6-2 300, it gets 2620 on the LCTII >test. It sounds pretty close.... The LCT2 rating formula was specifically designed to match the results in the SSDF rating list. I think it's obvious that estimating playing strength via test suites is inferior to playing hundreds of test games. That being said, I think people pay way too much attention to the SSDF ratings. --Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.