Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF is NOT Corrupted. Really?

Author: Jay Rinde

Date: 15:16:49 09/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


Ah, yes! There MUST be something wrong some where. If one or two nuts claim some
one is cheating, then the postings at ccc will be inundated with replies. If I
said that the world is flat would you all reply or just figure I was a nut and
ignore it?



On September 27, 1999 at 17:16:02, Dann Corbit wrote:

>There is nothing else that remotely approaches the excellence of the SSDF in all
>of computer chess as far as testing goes.  To suggest that they are cheating
>without evidence is rather odd [IMO].
>
>This would require broad based collusion amongst the entire team of testers.
>
>Suggestion:
>Why don't you independently verify/refute the SSDF results with your own tests?
>
>All you have to do is run several thousand games in a carefully controlled test
>environment.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.