Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Poll Results... So Far Pretty Intriguing.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:46:19 09/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 28, 1999 at 14:03:02, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>On September 28, 1999 at 09:19:44, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On September 28, 1999 at 09:10:41, Steven Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>>I glanced over at the current poll (SSDF/Chessbase) this
>>>morning to find that, so far, it is 55 to 1 (with 16 abstentions)
>>>in favor of no improper Chessbase influence over SSDF decisions
>>>and testing.
>>>
>>>Considering the serious allegations posted by one of the
>>>members, that is a pretty firm vote of confidence for the SSDF.
>>>
>>>My only puzzlement is why 16 abstentions? Last year we had a
>>>poll about some Fritz results on the SSDF, and there was also
>>>a high percentage of abstentions. What is it about SSDF questions
>>>that causes a high percentage of abstentions?
>>>- Steve (ICD/Your Move)
>>>P.S. If you have not yet voted, please do so by clicking on
>>>the "Computer Chess Resource Center" link at the top or bottom
>>>of this page.
>>
>>
>>I can answer for one of those.  I simply don't have any trustworthy data.
>>I refuse to condemn ChessBase (nor would I clear them either) without some
>>firm data.  I have heard things about them that I don't like (IE the rumor
>>that they prevented everyone from having access to a quad xeon machine at
>>the WCCC this year) but rumors aren't enough make me want to condemn them
>>outright...
>>
>
>	How could they do that? I thougth that every program was running on whatever
>hardware its team could get for the competition.
>
>>that was my reason for abstaining...  I would rather wait until I see something
>>concrete...


Generally the machines are provided.  If you want something faster than what is
supplied, you are free to get anything you want.  But if everyone _could_ have
had a quad xeon (even if they weren't parallel) it should have happened.  The
xeon is a better processor than the basic PII/PIII, and the quads have better
memory bandwidth/latency due to the 4-way interleaving they do...  so they would
have helped everyone that used a machine supplied by the tournament...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.