Author: James T. Walker
Date: 18:48:13 09/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 1999 at 11:26:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >On September 28, 1999 at 04:03:26, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On September 27, 1999 at 23:34:32, Eelco de Groot wrote: >> >>>About being commercially available and being identical to the version sold to >>>the public, I think that is a bit relative. Chessbase provides 'updates' on an >>>almost continual basis of which in many cases it is not clear which bugs they >>>are supposed to fix. Other companies maybe rather test a bit longer before they >>>release their programs. I rather hope that Chess Tiger 12.0 is not entirely the >>>version that is going to be released to the public if testing shows that it >>>could still be improved! In my opinion this is not an entirely fair requirement >>>if you were to use it very strictly. >>> >>>Eelco. >> >>I think it's easiest and best for the general public if the commercial version >>and the version being tested coincide. No doubt Christophe has and will >>continue to perform autoplayer experiments without SSDF assistance. >> >>Dave > > >My tests for improving Chess Tiger include NO AUTOPLAYER GAMES. > >So far the only autoplayers games by Tiger have been played only by testers and >the SSDF. Also, when I release a new version, Ed Schröder runs some autoplayer >matches as a sanity check for the new version. > >I don't use these results to change my engine. > >Tiger is not tuned against any commercial opponent. > > > Christophe Hello Christophe, I have been reading about Chess Tiger for over a year now. I can't wait much longer to get my hands on it! Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.