Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 12:16:34 10/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 1999 at 14:03:12, blass uri wrote: >On October 03, 1999 at 13:38:55, Steve Schooler wrote: > ><snipped> >> 3) How could Deep Blue "blunder" a winning position into an >> "elementary" draw by perpetual check which was only 8 or 10 ply >> deep? > >It was not 8 or 10 ply deep. > >Commercial programs cannot see the draw even after a long time >and they have no problem to see 8-10 plies. > >I am sure that you need to see more than 40 plies to see repetition >(I read that you need 60 plies). > >Uri Have a look at: http://www.rebel.nl/db2.htm The analysis is still there. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.