Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nunn test is good!!

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:44:36 10/06/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 1999 at 07:09:18, Jouni Uski wrote:

>On October 06, 1999 at 05:39:01, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>
>>20 games far too few to make any judgement. Did you delete the learning files ?
>>Change yout time control a little bit, and see what happenes. You'll be
>>suprised.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>--Tec
>
>My point just is, that 20 games is enough! Even if statistics say You need
>100s of games...
>
>I don't enable learning ever. If I change time control a little bit, no change
>in scores.
>
>Jouni


Why play a match with learning off?  why not ponder=off?  or with the passed
pawn scoring turned off?  or with the time allocation code turned off?  An
engine is the sum of its parts.  When you turn off one part, what does that do
to the validity of the test?



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.