Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 16:19:10 10/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 1999 at 14:45:17, CLiebert wrote: >On October 06, 1999 at 12:38:52, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>On October 06, 1999 at 11:56:47, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>I wonder if some credit can still be given to the promise that after a while >>>Little Goliath will be replaced by the big brother, a real, awesome, full size >>>Goliath. I wonder if ever Big Goliath existed anyway. Maybe the author is >>>waiting a natural growing of the actual little thing to become the big one? Some >>>day Little Goliath will get enough stature as to be considered the big one? >>>If that is the plan, I have serious doubts it can ever be accomplished. Little >>>Goliath is strong, but not more strong and by the way not more knowleadgeable, >>>not more attractive and no more special than any other fast searcher; in fact a >>>lot less than Junior, that being a fast searcher is also a very very strong >>>program, with positional acumen. And also is less interesting than Fritz, >>>another fast searcher with infinite features and awfully play, not just strong. >>>I do not say this because I have score against LG and I feel proud and arrogant. > > >"Goliath" will be totaly different to LG2000, knowledge-based and >not a fast searcher. Michael himself said that LG2000 has nothing >special, it is a very simple program. > >Christian Yeah, that he said two years ago. But then the only thing you see is one version after another of the simple stuff, non special ting, and none of the big one. If the big one is the real one, then you would expect, on the contrary, more effort in that that in the "simple program". Of course always you can say he is secretively working in that. Like Frankestein in his castle. Well, hope it is so. Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.