Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quiescent v Normal Node Ratio

Author: Landon Rabern

Date: 18:42:55 10/06/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 1999 at 13:53:36, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>You have to be really careful when comparing these two values.  Think about
>this...  You use Search() so long as depth is > 0.  But as soon as depth ==0
>you call Quiesce... a node you can not possibly avoid searching (most of us
>refer to such nodes as 'leaf' nodes.  Below this your searching is optional,
>but to get here you have no choice at all.  This means that 1:1 is about the
>best you can do the way you are counting nodes.  Below this point you can do
>a lot using the so-called "delta pruning" that is being discussed in another
>thread...  5:1 is high, delta will drop that to well below 2:1

So when you get to depth=0 do you run a q-search always or just when the
previous move was a capture,check, etc. ?




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.