Author: James B. Shearer
Date: 22:45:22 10/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 1999 at 00:10:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 09, 1999 at 23:26:16, James B. Shearer wrote: > >> I'm not playing 5 0 because I like it, this is the only time control >>your formula allows me to play (I also played a few 2 1 games a while ago but >>this really is kind of hopeless especially with the interface I'm using and my >>rating got knocked out of range). I expect I would do a bit better at 3 3 or >>1 6. >> >> <deletions> > >It should play almost anything from 5 3 on down (blitz) or any standard time >control up to 30 30. Is something broken that I don't know about? I believe if you check your formula for scrappy you will find it will play rated games if you are within 400 rating points at a variety of time controls but will only play 5 0 unrated. Since I am a bit more than 400 rating points lower than scrappy I can only play unrated 5 0 games. <deletions> >All I can say about speed is that on the quad P6/200, it runs about 400K >nps normally, with blips to 500K+ in endgames. However, it taking an unusual >amount of time on one move doesn't guarantee that it 'failed low' at all >when the machine gets loaded. Unfortunately I now can't tell exactly as the >automatic script that cleans out old log files has run and deleted all those >logs... Perhaps you should save the logs for losses (at least for a while). This shouldn't take much space if they are really few and far between. James B. Shearer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.