Author: blass uri
Date: 10:30:48 10/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 1999 at 12:43:25, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On October 16, 1999 at 12:32:17, blass uri wrote: > >>On October 16, 1999 at 11:57:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On October 16, 1999 at 10:51:51, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On October 16, 1999 at 10:12:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>> >>>>>How is ctiger in sweden doing ? >>>> >>>>Is Tiger 12 being tested for the November list? I hope so. >>>> >>>>>I have heard they have a few copies and test on 450 Mhz. >>>>>how many games have been played ? >>>>>Elo so far ?? >>>> >>>>Let's guess: 50 to 100 above the second. >>>> >>>>By the way, I started playing Tiger 12 - Fritz 6. I am not sure yet, but it >>>>looks like Tiger will crush it. It is too fast for Fritz 6. >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>I think in 40/120 fritz6 gets outcomputed by search-depth. >>>thats what i always said: one day they will makle fritz more intelligent, >>>because they have to. >> >>>this moment, fritz will not has it strength (enomous depths) anymore, this >>>will lead into a lack of strength. >>>And ? as a result it will not be any stronger. >> >>I do not know if you are right or wrong. >> >>How do you know that Fritz6 is not more intelligent? > >Judging by NPS (?), Fritz 6 should be more "intelligent" then F532, since it is >about 20% slower. What I find peculiar is that in the middle-game Tiger, 3 to 4 >times slower in nps, is reaching the same ply-depth of Fritz 6. > >>Do you have it? >> >>I know that Enrique's games are faster than 40/120 > >Do you think this matters a lot with Tiger and Fritz? I doubt it. I do not know and we cannot know without testing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.