Author: Tim Mirabile
Date: 10:40:10 11/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
It would help if you post the position, but one thing I will say is that a 0.2 pawn evaluation is not very meaningful - the game could go either way. Also, it's not a good idea in general to trust computer evaluations. A computer's strength is based on the moves it plays, not on the ability to correctly evaluate a position. On November 01, 1999 at 10:51:43, Mark Andreoli wrote: > I am truly stumped! I put a game of mine on the analysis mode the other >day.Fritz 5 kept saying I was losing with this particular move. I put it at >.2pawns/70 seconds the first time then .2 pawns/300 seconds the next time. Both >times I am lost with this particular move.So says Fritz 5 analysis?! > > However I was not convinced and I proceeded to play the Fritz 5 engine >against itself. I did this for three long time controls(40 moves @2.5,3.5 and >7.5 hours each) and F5 won against F5 using MY inferior move. What I don't get >is this ,by the way this is the first time with over hundreds of games I have >analized, that the engine vs. engine mode proved the analysis wrong.Is this >possible? > > > So we have the analysis saying I am losing but the engine vs. engine mode >saying that I am winning. Maybe the way I set up the analysis using Fritz 5 is >not at its optimum settings? Is it me ? Am I stumped or is this little "game" of > mine putting Fritz in a "FRENZY?" > > If anyone is interested I could put the moves of the game down also!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.