Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:51:34 11/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 1999 at 20:04:27, Rajen Gupta wrote: >I do not know why such a big fuss is made about ''how ''deep blue makes its >moves or whatever-after all its just a supercomputer powered by hundreds of >regular powerpc chips with the added bonus of having an additional few hundreds >of chips specially optimised to do chess calculations together with an analysed >database of every single gm game ever played on this planet. > >it is no surprise that it should play so well-the greatest surprise is that >unlike a true sportsman it refused to give its opponent a return match or allow >its opponent to play a few test games with it beforehand-but then ibm have never >been sportsmen. It _did_ give kasparov a re-match. They played in 1996 and 1997. But would _you_ give someone a rematch after they continually claimed you cheated, had human help, used unfair tactics, etc? _I_ wouldn't. Although a little birdie tells me that there _will_ be another Kasparov match one day... > >Any of the current chess programmers would have beaten the butts of deepblue if >they had the facility to port their programmes to the hardware that db was >running on > >deep blue is everything to do with hardware and nothing to do with the software. > >i also doubt if Hsu or anyone else from the db project is ever going to come out >with this so-called superchip! > >rajen gupta
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.