Author: KarinsDad
Date: 09:00:57 11/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 1999 at 07:51:58, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On November 15, 1999 at 22:06:03, Peter McKenzie wrote: > [snip] >> >>Of course none of what you say refutes what I said, because I said 'any given >>position' (which means any possible position) couldn't be compressed into 64 >>bits. > >KQK can be compressed into less than 64 bits. I think what Peter was saying is that any random (i.e. any possible) position may or may not be compressed within 64 bits, but you cannot guarantee that it will. KQK is not a random position, but rather one which is known to compress within 64 bits. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.