Author: Bella Freud
Date: 14:34:00 11/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Uri, On November 17, 1999 at 16:59:47, blass uri wrote: >On November 17, 1999 at 10:12:12, Bella Freud wrote: > ><snipped> >>>>Now the current post. Is it moderator post, or not moderator post? >>> >>> >>>Not really that difficult. If you had been paying attention, you'd notice that >>>the moderation posts start with "Moderation:". >>> >> >>Doh ! >> >>Blass Uri started this thread with "Moderation:insults". He is not a moderator. >>Thus the thread is about "moderation" and was not entitled by a 'moderator'. > >The moderators told the members say to use the word moderation in the subject if >the subject is about moderation. >This is the reason I started with the word moderation in the title. > >karinsdad explained that he is responding with his moderator >hat on when the word moderation is on the subject >and with his moderator hat off if the subject begin without the word moderation. Oh right. So if there is "Moderation" in the title and the thread is started by a non-moderator then whenever a moderator joins in he is speaking with his hat on. Right. So I must be more careful not to get nuked when this happens. > ><snipped> >>First rule of those trying to never answer anything. Turn it round the other way >>!!! >> >>And 'final' decision? News to me. I thought discussion of moderation issues was >>allowed here. Something aout Orwellian if not. > >Discussions about moderation issues are allowed here if you use the word >moderation as the first word of the subject. > >The moderators explained it in an email to the members some monthes ago. > >> >>You've been trying to get me banned for days now. Hence your provocations. >> >>Actually it says "perhaps" above, meaning any one of the possibilities (see >>below) given might or might not be true. >> >>Personally I think it is the third case listed. You have a hidden agenda. That >>is to be a 'pretend programmer' to gain status withing the hierarchy, and then >>to use that status to get yourself elected as moderator. > >I do not know. >There were not many candidates to be moderators because most of the people did >not want this job. > >I declined this job but I may change my mind about it in 2000. If I am not nuked by then, I will propose you. I am sure you would show wisdom. >I did not decide about it. > >I did not vote for karinsdad because of the fact that he does not give his real >name. This was indeed strange. Bella > >I do not think that people voted for him because they believe that he did a >chess program. I think it helps to get credibility here to be a programmer. In fact it is almost an imperative. >I understood that he does not claim that he developed a chess program and he >only tries to do it. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.