Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 14:54:06 11/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 1999 at 10:49:05, Andrew Carey wrote: > >On November 23, 1999 at 06:11:03, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>I agree with you. Only that the program stayed on my computer for less than an >>hour :-(. It makes sense that Rebel Comp. wanted to use an existing interface. >>But did they have to use _this_? Better sell it as an engine for winboard! >> >>--Tec > >I have heard from beta testers of Rebel-Tiger. so your opinion based on someone _telling_ you something is less prejudiced than mine, when I actually tested the product? >This uses also the CP user interface. yes, we all know. >Rebel-Tiger comes e.g. with nice boards (2D) and has a very >good handling. Then the Interface has been improved a lot above rebel partner? Great. But why does the rebel-site then have a link to chess_partner and why do they mention that you can download a chess_p time limited demo when the interface is already much improved? >It is / will be a great product when it comes on the market. It will be another strong engine, yes. Congratulations to Christopher. >it is too early imo to call this product worthless no one did >out in a few days/weeks with the best chess program on the market thats your opinion. (Prejudice?) >and a very good user-interface. thats your opinion (Prejudice?) Regards, --Tec
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.