Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does this make any sense? Anyone tried?

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 07:12:44 11/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


Hi

On November 26, 1999 at 08:43:38, Paul Clarke wrote:
>
><delurk>
>
>I think Chinook (the draughts/checkers program) uses a similar idea. After, for
>example, an 11-ply search, it plays the first four ply of the PV and then does
>a 9-ply search of the resulting position. If this shows the score dropping
>substantially, Chinook will allocate more time and try to search more deeply.

I think this is a very clever idea. And implemented in this way it's
surely different from a "normal" selective search. The big difference is,
that if the 2nd search sees that the score is dropping, this is just a hint
for the main search, to search more deeply. Whereas in the "normal" selective
search, the nodes from the leaves are backuped up in a standard minimax
way, and this can lead to a completely wrong score for the root-nodes, when
it skips important lines.

I will definitely give this idea a try in my engine.

Kind regards,
 -sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.