Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 01:08:25 12/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
Of course. I just wanted to make it clear that there's no significant difference between a K6-2 and a PIII (except price :). That was a little hard to tell from your list. (In fact, some programs run significantly faster on the K6-2 than the PIII.) The K6-3 and Celeron are kind of wildcards. They have on-die L2 caches that might seriously benefit some chess programs. -Tom On December 02, 1999 at 02:07:55, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On December 01, 1999 at 21:37:34, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>I think the difference between a PII and PIII can't be significant. > >It's not. :) > >>Here is my >>list, from slowest to fastest: >> >>1. Pentium >>2. K6-2, K6-3, Celeron, PII, PIII >>3. Athlon, PIII CuMine > >That pretty much agreed with my list. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.