Author: John Warfield
Date: 00:25:27 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1999 at 03:18:23, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On December 05, 1999 at 00:52:22, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>On December 04, 1999 at 18:28:56, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On December 04, 1999 at 17:07:23, John Warfield wrote: >>> >>>>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >>>> >>>>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>>>USCF master strength!!! >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree!! And this kind of thinking is coming from people who are soppose to >>>>be so smart??? One man holds this entire newsgroup hostage, if that man were to >>>>change his mind tommorow about the GM issue then the whole group would follow, >>>>mindless idiots. >>> >>>I don't recall Bob recently suggesting that the best programs are barely playing >>>at USCF master strength. But if you don't want to look silly, you can scan >>>through the CCC archives and come up with it yourself. >>> >>>"Mindless idiots"... a good attempt at irony, I'll grant you that. >>> >>>Dave >> >> >>I wish you would learn to seperate posts. I didn't mention Bob Hyatt at all, in >>my posts. That is a reference made by Walter Irvin. I did however refer to >>recently several people on here attempting to make out that programs where not >>even Uscf Master strength. It was not Hyatt who said this, even he wont go that >>crazy, he thinks about 2450 fide. So if anyone is looking silly it might be >>someone who needs to pay a bit better attention? > >I wish you would read more carefully. Where did I mention your name? > >Dave I could ask you the same question, Where in my above post did I mention Bob's Name?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.