Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New SSDF list

Author: Ritter Rost

Date: 13:49:41 12/05/99

Go up one level in this thread


>Then, when I have fixed something, I have a very long automatic procedure to
>test if the fix has broken something in my program. Because the main problem is
>that often what you consider as an improvement actually HURTS your program.
>
>This automatic procedure involves no commercial or amateur opponent. I have 4
>computers to achieve this task, but they are not connected to each other. No
>auto232 involved at all.

This sounds a lot like you are playing your new version against your previous
one (unless you discovered the universal formula of chess or use 32-men
tablebases). But doesn't this bear the danger of incest? A negative scoring
against your previous version could hide a strong benefit against other programs
(or humans). Auto232-ing would show that better,

Ritter Rost



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.