Author: James Robertson
Date: 15:57:13 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1999 at 03:09:25, John Warfield wrote: >On December 04, 1999 at 18:41:53, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On December 04, 1999 at 17:07:23, John Warfield wrote: >> >>>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>>USCF master strength!!! >>> >>> >>> I agree!! And this kind of thinking is coming from people who are soppose to >>>be so smart??? One man holds this entire newsgroup hostage, if that man were to >>>change his mind tommorow about the GM issue then the whole group would follow, >>>mindless idiots. >> >>For every game you show me where the program beat the GM, I will show you >>another one where an under 2300 beat the program. Go look at the Aegon games, >>for instance. >> >>Signed: a blind man and mindless idiot. > > > What your missing!! Is that I can also show you as many games where >Grandmasters have lost to 2300 players, this happens as you well know. So what's >your point? You really miss it don't you. If a program beats a 2500 player 3 times and loses to a 2300 3 times the performance rating is not 2500. Similarily, a GM cannot be a GM by losing as many games to 2300 players as he wins against GMs. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.