Author: Will Singleton
Date: 20:33:55 12/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 1999 at 22:24:36, James T. Walker wrote:
>On December 08, 1999 at 20:28:11, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>On December 08, 1999 at 17:55:23, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>
>>>Given the flurry of excitement about benchmarking TSCP in the recent past, I'm
>>>surprised that only a handful of people have reported their score on the new
>>>TSCP benchmark.
>>>
>>>For people who don't know, TSCP 1.41 has a new command ("bench") that will
>>>report a nodes/second score. It takes less than a minute if you have a fast
>>>computer. TSCP now comes with an executable for Windows, too, so you [probably]
>>>don't even have to compile it yourself.
>>>
>>>I'm keeping a list of these scores so people can see how processor X might stack
>>>up against processor Y at computer chess.
>>>
>>>My home page has been hit 406 times since I posted the new version of TSCP, and
>>>I'd really appreciate it if some of you sent in your scores... =)
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Tom
>>
>>For your info, here's the last group of scores from the recent "flurry." I'll
>>run the new one on my little old mac pb/300, and also on the Athlon 700.
>>
>>Will
>>
>>TSCP v1.3
>>
>>Platform Compiler nps Dann's build
>>
>>Athlon/700 msvc opt 86,700 x
>>P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x
>>K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x
>>Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075
>>K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x
><snip>
>
>Hello Will,
>The K6-2/400 is faster than the K6-3-450. Can you tell me why this is?
>Jim Walker
No. I remember that when it happened, and there was some discussion. Who
knows, maybe some machines get shipped with different cpu's than labeled.
Overall, the numbers give a good idea of what to expect for generic integer
programs.
Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.