Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GM's vs Comps at random chess? I expect GM's to get spanked.

Author: Paulo Soares

Date: 21:25:49 12/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 19, 1999 at 22:16:50, Hasnain Mujtaba wrote:

>Hi Charles
>
>I don't know about any one-on-one Human vs Computer match-ups at chess variants,
>but in an experiment conducted in 1997, a team of two different chess computers
>(each with Elo > 2500) and an amateur human 'controller' (Elo 1900) defeated GM
>Arthur Yusupov (at the time #31 in the world with Elo 2640) in an 8 games match
>with a score of 5:3. The match was in "Shuffle Chess" -- a variant where you
>start the game with the back rank pieces arranged at random.
>
>The two chess programs ran in some k-best modes and the human controller would
>then pick what he thought were the best moves from the two k-best lists.
>
>The purpose of the experiment was to guage the combined strength of humans and
>computers. On their own, the ametuer and the computers will lose to GMs at chess
>variants because they don't have the tactical strength. But together, as this
>experiment shows, they can do quite well.
>
>You can read more about this experiment at
>(http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/www/fakultaet/iam/personen/CA-Chessd.html).
>
>Regards
>Hasnain.
>
Hasnain,
I always wanted to have information regarding this game type. It is the first
time(!) that I read some thing about this subject. A 1900 ELO player,
assisted by programas, winning GMs!
I liked the information of the site a lot, I thank you very much
for the good information!!!

Paulo Soares, from Brazil



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.