Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer-Chess effort -- another opinion

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 18:48:52 12/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1999 at 20:43:10, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On December 22, 1999 at 20:17:47, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>>On December 22, 1999 at 10:44:38, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>But this is in complete contradiction with what he initially said:
>>>
>>>"BTW, I wasn't intending to get into a discussion about the proposal here. I was
>>>asking for volunteers."
>>
>>Clue: I said that because I was trying to stop the gang-flaming I was getting
>>from people who were attacking a straw-man.
>>
>>Then I gave up on that, and I started both listening and trying to ensure that
>>people stopped claiming they were refuting my position when I really don't have
>>a position.
>>
>>Now I'm a liar for it.
>>
>>This group was founded to be a better forum than Usenet. In this case, it's far
>>worse.
>
>Look, I think we *ALL* got off on the wrong foot on this one.  Why don't we all
>just wipe the slate clean and start over.
>
>Hi.  My name is Dann.  I understand you have an interesting idea for creating
>chess engines using FPGA's and a large cluster of cheap hardware components.
>Why don't you tell us more about it, and perhaps give us some background on the
>technology that *you* offer.  Likely, we have not heard of it before.  Then,
>perhaps, you can tell us where your deepest lack of information is and we may be
>able to help.

pmfji, but hear hear.  Thanks, and I look forward to a possibly productive
discussion.  Greg?

Will




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.