Author: Pete Galati
Date: 16:59:14 12/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1999 at 19:02:08, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Fernando, i have tried this out on my 400 Mhz. >it loses. >if sargon5 would have been Mach3, than maybe it would have a chance. >but the old Mach2c version was not that strong. > >what a pity. anyway. we need the spracklens back IMO. >why don't they come back with sargon6 ? >its the right time to come back in year 2000. Sargon 2000, sort of has a good comercial ring doesn't it? Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.