Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:38:31 01/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2000 at 15:38:53, Chris Carson wrote: >There have been posts showing ICC lists at Blitz, >Bullet and 40/2. I agree that the number is few, >but it is what it is. :) Does the ICC data contradict >me? :) If so, post and I will accept the data. :) ICC doesn't do 40/2 games. They do standard blitz and bullet. Standard is most commonly something like game/30 or game/60 at best, and often quite a bit quicker... which has no relationship to 40/2hr. > >I have also been known to admit when I was wrong. I >have been in the past. I use to think the SSDF ratings >were 200 points to high, then 100 points to high, but when >the error of measure is taken into account and Tournament >Performance Ratings, well, it is what it is. :) > >Please post your data and links. I hear people >say x is to high, but when asked what is correct, >they usually don't provide an answer or data to >support it. Just curious. Bob and Ed have been >doing this for a long time and have a lot of data, >take a closer look at how they respond to the posts. :) > >What do you think is the correct rating? What data >supports it? Thanks. :) > >By the way. Who is Chessfun? > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.