Author: blass uri
Date: 09:32:29 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 08:24:51, Steve McRiley wrote: >On January 10, 2000 at 22:07:03, Mark Young wrote: > >>On January 10, 2000 at 21:14:20, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 10, 2000 at 20:51:58, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>"it makes positional errors and misplays some endgames" >>>> >>>>"It doesn?t understand piece mobility."...... Very true in this game. >>>> >>>>"Crafty is a weak program compared with the best commercial chess >>>>programs." >>>> >>Your point is valid, I tested crafty 16.6 because it was the version being >>discussed in other post, and it was the version used in the article and that you >>pointed out had a good result in one of the acticles tournament. (The swiss >>tournament I think.) I will now test Crafty 17.4 vs Fritz 6 at game 30. The >>lastest chessbase version of crafty on the Chessbase site and will post the >>results tomorrow. > >Why dont you play a 'real' game with the 'real' crafty - Tablebases, big book >and pondering instead of this Chessbase version? > >/McRiley I am interested to see the results of a match between the 'real' crafty and the chessbase version. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.