Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:23:57 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 18:23:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 11, 2000 at 18:06:32, Mark Young wrote: > >>On January 11, 2000 at 08:24:51, Steve McRiley wrote: >> >>>On January 10, 2000 at 22:07:03, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On January 10, 2000 at 21:14:20, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 10, 2000 at 20:51:58, Mark Young wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"it makes positional errors and misplays some endgames" >>>>>> >>>>>>"It doesn?t understand piece mobility."...... Very true in this game. >>>>>> >>>>>>"Crafty is a weak program compared with the best commercial chess >>>>>>programs." >>>>>> >>>>Your point is valid, I tested crafty 16.6 because it was the version being >>>>discussed in other post, and it was the version used in the article and that you >>>>pointed out had a good result in one of the acticles tournament. (The swiss >>>>tournament I think.) I will now test Crafty 17.4 vs Fritz 6 at game 30. The >>>>lastest chessbase version of crafty on the Chessbase site and will post the >>>>results tomorrow. >>> >>>Why dont you play a 'real' game with the 'real' crafty - Tablebases, big book >>>and pondering instead of this Chessbase version? >> >>I have played matches against the "real" Crafty with Bob at the controls. >>Crafty lost, the games have been posted here and on RGCC, it should not be to >>hard for you to recover the post if you want to see the games. >> >>> > >weren't those against this same broken version (16.6, etc.???) Ie nothing >in the last 3 months+??? Which time, I have played more then one. I don't think it was 16.6, but the version will be in the posts. > > > >>>/McRiley
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.