Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:37:02 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 12:27:07, Jari Huikari wrote: >On January 12, 2000 at 12:08:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>But against humans moving quickly definitely is good. you get only >>in troubles against class A players and above, who usual feel the >>psychological need to directly react a lot less. >> >>but for anything under that level, i'm very sure that moving directly >>is putting psychological a lot pressure on the opponent, till they get >>used to it. > >I may remember this wrong, but I have an image that DB in some game >agains Kasparov didn't use all the thinking time allowed, but tried >to put Kasparov into troubles partly by moving fast? > >Do you think that thinking on opponents time benefits a human more than >a computer? How much stronger is a program in long game with permanent >brain than without it? I'd think that PB means much more in Blitz. > > Jari Please don't invent Don Quichot stories about Deep Blue. Kasparov writes down time management just like a lot of players when he annotates moves (i do that too). Game 6 notation by kasparov was published in icca. It showed *exactly* 3 minutes a move, and about 20 to 30 seconds operator time. Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.