Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 01:44:37 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 03:21:14, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Robert Hyatt on January 13, 2000 at 23:31:57: > >[ snips ] > >>There are some things above that are very suspicious. At the top of the >>response, he directly quoted Hsu. But after the beginning, no more quotes >>to support his less than savory description of Hsu's actions. I find this >>troubling. If he would quote him at the beginning, then couldn't he quote >>some of his "belligerent" comments as well? > >Maybe Mr. Williams has manners? > >Now WHO started this? > >Action forces reaction. > >Kasparov was attacked. > >May he please defend himself? > >>I suppose we will have to wait a good while. Knowing Hsu he kept copies of >>everything he sent and everything he received. Now that this 'claim' has been >>made in public, posting the emails to show what really went on would be >>perfectly acceptable, IMHO. > >Having had the pleasure to meet Mister Williams and Kasparov and talk about >similar things AND being in email with Hsu about the Paderborn blitz games >it's not so difficult for me to figure who is the telling the truth here. > >Negotiations failed. Then Hsu thought it would be a good idea to wash one's >dirty linen in public putting pressure on Kasparov. > >>And should be done, to show the true story... whatever that is... > >Yes, a horrible way of doing business. And I can confirm Hsu making many >"belligerent" comments to me. Owen's story exactly matches my own experience >with Hsu. Owen's story fits. > >I hate to say this in public but Kasparov doesn't deserve this. > >Ed Could not all those facts that wrote regarding Hsu and Kasparov be a form of calling people's attention, that is to say, marketing? Only a thought. Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.