Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 04:40:32 01/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2000 at 07:09:12, Chessfun wrote: >On January 16, 2000 at 07:05:54, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On January 16, 2000 at 03:53:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2000 at 01:02:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 15, 2000 at 00:43:50, Steve Lopez wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 14, 2000 at 22:32:04, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 14, 2000 at 22:24:02, CM7000_GM wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 14, 2000 at 22:11:38, Steve Lopez wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 13, 2000 at 15:47:13, Albert Silver wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You get the picture. It is one of spite and bitterness, and all in all quite >>>>>>>>>sad. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It *is* being moderated, though. One of Sean's posts just got deleted about five >>>>>>>>minutes ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>-- Steve Lopez >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This assertion by Mr. Lopez is accurate.... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I think CM7000_GM is yet another SAD Sean incarnation >>>>> >>>>>Undoubtedly, since CM7000's above post is just an edited version of something >>>>>Sean posted tonight in rgcc (A friend, who knows I'm ignoring the little dweeb, >>>>>e-mailed me the rgcc post. I told him not to bother anymore -- it's not remotely >>>>>interesting to me). >>>>> >>>>>-- Steve Lopez >>>>> >>>>>The Chess Kamikaze Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/ludekdudek/ >>>>>[winner of the highly-coveted Van Dorp Web Site of the Whatever Award] >>>>> >>>>>The Chess Kamikaze Club: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chesskamikazes >>>> >>>> >>>>I think we are up to our armpits in sean clones. Again, dumping hotmail.com >>>>would be a good start to clean up CCC. These free email sites are simply more >>>>trouble than good. Yes there are good people using them. But ugh, are there >>>>some bad ones to go along with them. And a couple of bad apples spoil the >>>>entire barrel. >>> >>> >>>I totally agree with you Bob. >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>Do you really think that banning free emails (if you can find all of them, new >>ones pop up all the time) is going to stop Sean from causing shit. >> >>IP monitoring is a better way. Any other way you are punishing the 98% of other >>people who use free emails and post here and are good members. > > >I agree, there must be a way to make sure that users >are only posting with one name. Banning free e-mails >when they could be being used for a variety of reasons >is foolish. JMO. >Thanks. Maybe the no tolerance rule if IP monitoring is too hard. That mean fools who come on as CM7000_GM and have an email CM7000_GM@hotmail.com can be given the flick if they post stupid or pointless or offending stuff within the first 3 months on their first offense, then they can be treated better if they have proven themselves after this time. But if this type of name is used hardly ever and after 6 months post all of a sudden something crap, then they can be given the flick right away as well. New members who post clear rubbish from the start should be booted, this includes non topic posts, and other offendind posts. If they cannot respect this place when they join, then we do not want them. If I was ever moderator (which I won't cause I do not have the time) I would want this, and would be happy to implement it. If this meant that fools would stop coming in here all the time and causing trouble then I would boot these offenders the hell out of here. As too any new member complaining about this. Probably it is the person just kicked out under another new name. And if it was a good person booted, then they can join again under another name and try again, or email the moderators and explain why they acted so pathetically. I get the impression Sean has always been floating around here, and is doing so right now. I think all future moderators should be hard on new people joining if they mess up. This will help weed out the losers just wanting trouble. There are at least 6 people from their first posts that I knew were trouble and have pretty much ended up causing trouble. Bella was one from the start that I said to the moderators to get rid of. Membership here is a privellage and honour, not a right. So I see no problems with implementing this agenda. "New members do right, OR YOUR GONE"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.