Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov's manager answers Hsu

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:16:07 01/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 16, 2000 at 13:35:04, James B. Shearer wrote:

>On January 16, 2000 at 10:27:18, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 16, 2000 at 02:17:21, James B. Shearer wrote:
>>
>                        <snip>
>
>>>          Hsu's projections in the 1990 Scientific American article for the next
>>>generation machine due in 1992 were 1000 chess chips, 3 million positions per
>>>second per chip, 1 billion positions per second overall and 3400 rating.  The
>>>actual results for DB-2 which arrived in 1997 (5 years late) were 256 chess
>>>chips, 2-2.5 million positions per second per chip, 200 million positions per
>>>second overall and rating 2900.  So he missed rather badly.
>>>                            James B. Shearer
>>
>>
>>DB-2 used 480 chess chips, and peaked at 1B nodes per second.  I didn't see the
>>3200 rating, and wouldn't have believed _that_ had I seen it, which predicts
>>a 3:1 win/lose ratio vs a 2800 player.  But for his hardware, I think he hit
>>it pretty accurately, except for the time-frame.  When you read his book, you
>>will see that at least 2 years were lost in some of the P/R things IBM had him
>>do, such as playing in Hong Kong, where they had to cobble something together
>>with old hardware to play.  IBM wanted visibility _all_ along the way...
>
>          The IBM web site says 256 chips (32 processors * 8 chips per) but I
>see Hsu says 480 (30 processors * 16 chips per) in his IEEE paper so I suppose
>that is correct.  Still less than 1000.
>          As for speed if you want to compare peak rate then the projected peak
>rate was 3 billion (1000 chips * 3 million per) so he is still short.
>          The projected rating was 3400 not 3200.
>                                  James B. Shearer
>PS:       When is Hsu's book coming out?


Good question.  I would assume reasonably soon since it was in good shape.  I
gave him the usual "grammar critique" that he asked for, and asked him to expand
a bit more on the details of the last Kasparov match, as I felt he was getting
a bit rushed near the end and could add some more interesting details...

I haven't heard from him since he left IBM, but I would assume we should see
something before long...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.