Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 02:52:28 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2000 at 12:57:26, James A. Tackett wrote: > As a long time purchaser of many chess programs, I am most interested in the >playing style of the program rather than its objective strength. I would like >to here opinions on which comercial chess program comes closest to playing like >a HUMAN master. In my opinion, Junior 6. But I wonder to what extent this is subjective and not necessarily transferable. For example, there are people that find Genius "human like", while I think it's quite electronic. It would be interesting to see if people could identify who is the human player in human-computer games. Once I gave a test of this kind to Danny Kopec and he didn't do so well. Botvinnik thought that Tal played like a computer, sometimes I wonder about the "human likeness" of some Kasparov games, etc. I find this issue a bit puzzling. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.