Author: Graham Laight
Date: 03:40:03 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2000 at 13:11:52, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On January 17, 2000 at 13:05:13, Graham Laight wrote: > >>This is very much easier to read than the "cleaned" files - thanks very much! >> >>I think most casual observers would like to see them even cleaner, though. >> >>It might require annotation, or something, but for those of us who would like >>the information they contain, but who aren't prepared to spend the time >>analysing, a "superclean" version would be nice! > >Anything specific you can suggest I can do to help make them "superclean"? :) >I don't know about making annotation, but I'd like to make them as readable as >possible. > >Jeremiah If only I understood them a bit better, I'd know what to suggest! :-) Based on my imperfect knowledge, though, I can have a guess as to how I'd like to see them in a perfect world: * Never more than one piece of information per line of text * A blank line between all lines of information * All lines of text which contain a list of moves, a time, and a current evaluation should be laid out in the same way - e.g. Search Depth: 12 Eval: 1.2 Best Line: 15. Be5 Ke8 16. a6 Qxa6 Anyway - any sort of tidying up makes them better than the form in which they're presented on the IBM site, so let me express thanks and applause to Jeremiah! -g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.