Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Conspiracy -- conshmiracy

Author: blass uri

Date: 06:55:31 01/19/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2000 at 21:51:54, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Let's suppose the worst.  IBM decided to cheat.  Now, folks like Anand and
>Karpov are not going to risk a lifetime ban by doing something illegal.  So it
>would pretty much have to be a lower-eschelon player.  [Well, they could have
>crammed RJF into that box, but he would have been deathly afraid of a sinister
>plot, I'm afraid -- so I think we can rule that out also].
>
>So what are we left with?  How do you cheat against the world's best player (by
>a landslide?)???
>
>You have some lower level GM who can be tempted and yet will *never* spill the
>beans (hmm -- it seems it would take millions to do that, but what if he put the
>money in a Swiss bank account and decided to write a book...  Sounds a bit risky
>doesn't it)
>
>In short the cheater theories are idiotic.  It does not work.  Even if you could
>somehow pull it off, you would be sneaking in some high school track star to run
>against Michael Johnson.  And then taking the ENORMOUS risk that for the rest of
>his life, he would keep his mouth shut.
>
>It's ludicrous.  Insanely, bizarre.  I can't imagine how such a foolish
>expression can even escape the lips of any intelligent, thinking person.
>
>But forget all that, and suppose that you somehow manage to have a very clever
>human (maybe we get a 2600GM who hates GK's intestines) to participate.  The
>human says "Rxb2" and the computer says "a4."  Whom do you believe?  The GM
>can't outplay Kasparov -- we already know that.

The human cannot outplay kasparov but a team of a human and computer can do it.

It is possible that the human is intelligent enough to know when he cannot help
and when he can help.

I do not believe in the conspiracy theory but  it is clearly possible that a
team of deeper blue and 2600 or even 2400 player is better than deeper blue.

I believe that a team of me and a commercial program is better than a commercial
program inspite of the fact that commercial programs are more than 400 elo
points better than me.

Uri





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.