Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: hardware vs software

Author: David Blackman

Date: 04:49:10 01/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2000 at 19:28:38, walter irvin wrote:

>which is more important ?????? is it posible that a program written on a 286
>25mhz 4mg ram could be stronger than deep blue ????? is it posible that a
>program like sargon ran on a machine that produced 2,000,000,000,000,000 nps
>could reach 2900 elo ?? perhaps there are great untried methods that will
>produce major elo jumps ????

Hardware and software are both very important. At the moment we have the
illusion that hardware is more important, because all the "major" programs have
software of very similar quality. But if you take something strong, like a 16
bit version of Fritz or Genius, on the 286, and play it against something an
inexperienced chess programmer throws together in one weekend, then the 286 will
probably beat any hardware we have now.

However, if you had hardware that produced 2E15 NPS, you wouldn't have to do
anything very clever to get 2900 elo. Sargon would probably be good enough. But
this speed is millions of times faster than Deep Blue. I don't think we will see
anything this fast for many years.

There are great untried methods. Maybe they are even good enough for a 286 to be
stronger than Deep Blue. But i don't know what they are :-(



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.