Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DT and DB (prototype) vs Computers

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 10:46:03 01/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


Maybe problem was because Crafty doesn't generate checks in the Q-search?

Eugene

On January 25, 2000 at 12:57:33, Ernst A. Heinz wrote:

>>>This can actually be made theoretically sound, so where is the
>>>risk?
>>
>>If you lop off one ply, you overlook some tactics.  I don't see any way
>>around that at all...  I stopped seeing some types of nonsense when I got
>>rid of them, which made the search more stable.
>
>Sorry Bob,
>
>But normal futility pruning does not "lop off" one ply. It simply
>lifts the "stand pat" cutoffs from horizon nodes to frontier nodes.
>
>That is exactly why you can make it theoretically sound with a wide
>enough margin! My article on extended futility pruning in the ICCA
>Journal 21(2) explained this in considerable detail.
>
>Maybe, you did some kind of razoring which indeed lops off one ply.
>
>=Ernst=



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.